Looking at the carbon capture data, it looks like lat/lon data has been rounded to the first decimal place. Is this by design? Is it possible to get higher resolution data? Something on the order of 6-8 decimal places would be ideal.
Considering that the data is monthly totals, we thought that accuracy of lat/long would not have a large impact on predictions.
If we get more requests for accurate lat/long, we will take the call to update these.
In your screenshot, it shows only 1 decimal place for the lat/lon. It looks like the data has been rounded off before the csv was generated.
Sorry my bad…I misread those.